March 5th, 2014
09:50 AM ET

Minnesota Man Believes No School Kid Should Ever Go Hungry

In today's edition of the "Good Stuff," a Minnesota man starts a fund to help kids in need get hot lunch. CNN's Chris Cuomo reports.

In Minnesota right now, there are 45 public schools that will turn a student away from the lunch counter hungry if his account is empty. Staff will pull him out of the line and even stamp his hands.

Dave Axel says he can't stand for that.

“I just didn't like it and I sent my money in right away," he says.  "The more I thought about it, the more intense I became about it, and I wanted to do something for them.”

Axell has started the "Otter Angels" fund to pay for lunch for those students who can't afford it.

The best part is it's all done through the cash register so the fund kicks in automatically and anonymously.

See the full story at CNN affiliate WDAY  and if you have #GoodStuff news, let us know!

Leave a comment, post on Facebook, or tweet to @ChrisCuomo & @NewDay using #NewDay and submit your story on iReport.

Posted by
Filed under: News • The Good Stuff • Videos
March 5th, 2014
09:37 AM ET

... But You Should Be Fine

An asteroid is on the way and it's going to pass closer to the earth than the moon around 4 pm ET.

Posted by
Filed under: News • Social • Videos
March 5th, 2014
09:35 AM ET

Judge Shuts Down Student's Lawsuit Against Parents...For Now

A high school senior's lawsuit against her mother and father for financial support and college tuition hit a hurdle Tuesday when a New Jersey judge denied the teenager's request for immediate financial assistance from the parents.

Rachel Canning, 18, alleges in her lawsuit that her parents forced her out of their Lincoln Park, New Jersey home, and that she is unable to support herself financially. The lawsuit asks that her parents pay the remaining tuition for her last semester at her private high school, pay her current living and transportation expenses, commit to paying her college tuition and pay her legal fees for the suit she filed against her parents.

Her parents say she left home because she didn't want to obey their rules.

Judge Peter Bogaard denied the request for high school tuition and current living expenses at a hearing Tuesday in New Jersey State Superior Court. Another hearing will be held in April on other issues in the suit, including whether Canning left home of her own accord, the judge said.

Canning, an honor student and cheerleader at Morris Catholic High School in Denville, says in court documents she had to leave her parents' home because of emotional and psychological mistreatment, alleging, among other things, that her mother called her "fat" and "porky" and that her father threatened to beat her.

"I have been subjected to severe verbal and physical abuse by my mother and father," Canning wrote in a court certification. "I am not willingly and voluntarily leaving a reasonable situation at home to make my own decisions. I had to leave to end the abuse."

Canning left her parents' home at the end of last October. After spending two nights at her boyfriend's home, she moved into the home of her friend in a nearby town, where she has been staying ever since, according to court documents written by the parents' attorney.

Canning seeks a court's official declaration that she is unemancipated, meaning her parents would still be required to support her financially. She also is suing to reimburse her friend's parents, John and Amy Inglesino, for legal fees that they have been paying since the lawsuit was initiated, according to the suit.

Canning's parents, Sean and Elizabeth Canning, claim that allegations of abuse are completely unfounded.

"We were always her support team, cheering her on or defending her whenever she had a problem," wrote Elizabeth Canning in a court certification. She claims that her daughter was never forced out of the family's home, but rather "took it upon herself to run away so that she could live her life without any parental supervision and without any rules."

Canning was suspended from school for truancy last October, according to court documents filed by her parents' attorney, Laurie Rush-Masuret. Her parents told the teen that she could no longer see her boyfriend, who was also suspended from school. Car and phone privileges were also taken away. Once she learned of the punishment, Canning cut school again and then decided to run away, her father said in court documents.

Once she left home, her parents notified Morris Catholic High School that they would no longer pay for their daughter's tuition, the documents state.

"They stopped paying my high school tuition to punish the school and me, and have redirected my college fund indicating their refusal to afford me an education," Rachel Canning stated in court documents.

The situation around the teen and her family initiated an investigation by New Jersey's Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCPP), which received allegations that Rachel was being abused. The teen wrote in court documents that her school contacted the state agency.

When DCPP staffers interviewed the teen, her parents, and her two younger sisters, they ultimately "determined that allegation of emotional abuse was unfounded," a letter from DCPP states.

Sean Canning, a retired Lincoln Park police chief and current business administrator for the town of Mount Olive, told CNN affiliate WCBS that he and his wife are "distraught."

"We're being sued by our child. I'm dumbfounded. So is my wife. So are my other daughters," he said. "Living in our house, there's very few things. There's minor chores, there's curfews. When I say curfew, it's usually after 11 o'clock at night."

Sean Canning wrote in court documents that the Inglesinos, for taking in his daughter, had "enabled the situation to an absurd level. Under the guise of good intentions, they have arrogantly placed themselves in our stead and operated under the belief that their parenting style is superior to our own."

CNN's attempts to reach John or Amy Inglesino were unsuccessful.

Stephanie Frangos Hagan, a family law attorney and New Jersey State Bar Association family law officer, said to her knowledge, a case like this is unprecedented.

Though Canning is 18 years old, New Jersey law does not consider a person to be emancipated unless that person has left "the scope of his or her parents' authority," according to Hagan.

"A parent is not obligated to contribute to the support of an emancipated child," said Hagan. "A child is emancipated when he or she is beyond the control of the parents. Is she truly beyond the scope of her parents' authority, as a result of her own voluntary acts? That's for the judge to decide."

"The argument (she) is making is that she didn't leave home voluntary. She's saying 'I was thrown out,'" Hagan said.

Neither Rachel Canning nor her parents testified at Tuesday's hearing, but it saw a reunion between the daughter and her estranged parents, the first one in over four months. While Sean Canning was seen speaking to Rachel, Elizabeth was seen briefly weeping after being seated.

The parents' attorney, Rush-Masuret, told CNN that Elizabeth Canning is too upset about the situation to even talk about it. She said the Cannings have told their daughter to come home, and she has refused.

"To be clear, my clients never abandoned nor abused their child and they have asked her to come home. They simply sought to exert their own parental judgment and reasonable household rules which she is not willing to accept," Rush-Masuret said in court Tuesday.

Rachel Canning's attorney, Tanya N. Helfand, said Sean and Elizabeth Canning are being "negligent and irresponsible."

"Normal healthy parents want to help their children. They want their children to go to college. They want to help them with their difficulties," Helfand said in court.

"You may not get along wonderfully every single day with your teenager. That doesn't mean that you abandon them and you say, 'Guess what, you're on your own.'"

Judge Bogaard denied the request for the last semester of high school tuition because the school said she could continue anyway, since she is an honor student. And Rachel Canning wrote in her court certification that "The peer ministers at Morris Catholic have decided to raise funds to pay ... tuition so I don't have to leave early."

As for why he denied the request for immediate financial assistance, the judge indicated he didn't see an emergency situation, and would make further decisions at the next hearing.

The teen wrote in her court certification that she aspires to be a biomedical engineer. Her first choice for college is the University of Delaware, from which she has yet to hear back from regarding her admission decision. She said taking legal action was necessary to ensure that she is able to accomplish her future goals.

"I am a very good student. I have no drug problems. I am a good athlete. I work at a job outside of school," she wrote. "My parents simply will not help me any longer...(They) should be required to provide for my support and education until I can stand on my own two feet. In order to do this, I had to take legal action."

Posted by
Filed under: News • Videos
March 5th, 2014
09:11 AM ET

Do You Think Police Should Have Carte Blanche When it Comes to Chases?

According to a recent study, about 300 people die every year in the U.S. as a result of police chases.

On Tuesday, the supreme court once again took up the issue of when law enforcement should be allowed to use deadly force during high-speed pursuits, CNN's Pamela Brown reports.

Police dash cam video from 2004 shows how a simple traffic stop for a busted headlight ended in death.

Officers in West Memphis, Arkansas, weave through traffic on the video as Donald Rickard and his passenger, Kelly Allen, lead them on a high-speed chase through two states.

Officers finally cornered the Honda, but Rickard backed up, almost hitting one of the officers.

Police opened fire, shooting into the car 3 times and then another 12 times as it sped away.

Two minutes later, the Honda crashed into a house.

Rickard and Allen both died and Rickard's family sued, claiming the officers used excessive force.

The officers are arguing they have immunity when protecting the public in dangerous situations that require split-second decisions.

A precedent set by the high court in 2007 favors police, generally protecting them from civil liability in fast-moving situations.

Now this new case gives the justices a chance to revisit that decision, testing the limits of police discretion in using deadly force.

Posted by
Filed under: News • Videos
« older posts
newer posts »